Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest: A Reply to Dworkin Richard Norman Philosophical writing about civil disobedience tends to reach only the vaguest of conclusions: that it is normal1y wrong to disobey the law in a democratic society, but that in some circumstances civil disobedience may be justified, provided the issue is sufficiently serious and weighty and alternative methods have been.
In this essay I shall (1) bring to the surface some significant moments 1 The Documents of Vatican II,ed .Walter M Abbott (New York: Guild, 1966) 282-89. 2 Gaudium etspes no. 75. 3 Origins 13 (1983) 29-30. 21. 22 THEOLOGICAL STUDIES and important facets in the history and theology of civil disobedience, (2) wrestle with its precise nature, and (3) discuss briefly the particular recent.
The anti-nuclear movement is a social movement that opposes various nuclear technologies. Some direct action groups, environmental movements, and professional organisations have identified themselves with the movement at the local, national, or international level.
The civil rights movement of the mid-20th century is another important moment in time for the history of civil disobedience in the United States. Martin Luther King, Jr., among others, engaged in numerous nonviolent protests, such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott in Alabama, the Greensboro sit-in in North Carolina, as well as the Montgomery and Washington, D.C., marches and public demonstrations.
This piece by the philosopher and Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament founder Bertrand Russell was prefaced in the magazine thus: “This weekend Bertrand Russell and other demonstrators who accept the tactic of civil disobedience will take part in an unlawful protest against the Polaris missile in particular and nuclear policy in general.
T hat’s a way to remember the legacy of the external practice of non-violent civil disobedience used by the anti-nuclear movement of the 1970s, as with the civil rights movement of the 1960s, which did so much to expand and refine the techniques.
In the essay “Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela,” the author compares Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela who were instrumental personalities for the struggle. StudentShare. Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is.
The anti-nuclear movement in the United States in the mid-1970s arose from concerns held by many Americans about the dual dangers of nuclear power and nuclear weapons.
This is a background article. See Psychological aspects of civil disobedience. An anti-war activist is arrested for civil disobedience on the steps of the Supreme Court of the United States on February 9, 2005. Civil disobedience encompasses the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands and commands of a government or of an occupying power without resorting to physical violence.
Section 2: THE ANTI-NUCLEAR MOVEMENT:. Civil disobedience was also practiced by the anti-war and pacifist part of the peace movement, and it has ties with Gandhi’s methods in the anti-colonial struggle (see forthcoming notes on The Anti-Colonial Movement). Civil disobedience also raised deep questions about the extent to which we as citizens are expected to obey laws we do not agree with.
Anti-nuclear movement A nuclear. This helped the promulgation of civil disobedience but it produced policy confusion and, as the decade progressed, Committee of 100 groups engaged in actions on many social issues not directly related to war and peace. In the United States, in 1961, at the height of the Cold War, about 50,000 women brought together by Women Strike for Peace marched in 60.
Civil disobedience has also been used to find out and expose information concealed or suppressed by government. Spies for Peace was a group of Committee of 100 members who felt that sit-downs were not having sufficient impact on the government's weapons policies. They advocated infiltration, broke into military bases and sought out unknown and secret government information.